Quad Officials Discuss Structure of Year 2000 WTO Services Talks
This article was edited and reviewed by FindLaw Attorney Writers
| Last reviewedLegally Reviewed
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by FindLaw’s team of legal writers and attorneys and in accordance with our editorial standards.
Fact-Checked
The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our contributing authors. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please contact an attorney in your area.
There also appears to be significant debate among the parties regarding whether to adopt a "positive list" or "negative list" model for the negotiations. Under a positive list model (which was used in the GATS Agreement itself), parties identify the sectors for which they are willing to make liberalization commitments. A negative list model (which was used in the GATS financial services and telecommunications agreements) requires parties to schedule areas for which they are unwilling to commit to liberalization.
The inconsistency in press reports regarding whether a consensus has emerged on the appropriate approach is likely a result of the preliminary nature of current Quad discussions. None of the Quad countries has formally developed their positions at this time.
We expect the positions of the Quad members to change over time, as the list of sectors to be included in the negotiations is refined and the parties are better able to assess which approach will be more effective in achieving meaningful results with lesser developed nations. Additional preparatory talks are scheduled for late September.
Stay Up-to-Date With How the Law Affects Your Life
Enter your email address to subscribe:
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.