Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Quid Pro Quo Harassment with No Adverse Consequences?

This article was edited and reviewed by FindLaw Attorney Writers

| Last reviewed

This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by FindLaw’s team of legal writers and attorneys and in accordance with our editorial standards.

The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our contributing authors. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please contact an attorney in your area.

Burlington Industries v. Ellerth, 123 F.3d 490 (7th Cir. 1997), cert granted, No. 97-569, __U.S.__, 1998 WL 21891 (Jan 23, 1998)

The United States Supreme Court has decided to review whether a claim of quid pro quo sexual harassment may be brought under Title VII when the employee did not submit to the harasser's sexual advances and did not suffer any adverse employment actions.

Was this helpful?

Copied to clipboard