Transgender Employee Required to Use Restroom of His Biological Gender
This article was edited and reviewed by FindLaw Attorney Writers
| Last reviewedLegally Reviewed
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by FindLaw’s team of legal writers and attorneys and in accordance with our editorial standards.
Fact-Checked
The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our contributing authors. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please contact an attorney in your area.
The Minnesota Supreme Court upheld an employer's decision to require a biologically male employee to use the men's restroom despite his "transgender" female self-image. The employee was born male but considered herself female. She took female hormones, dressed as a woman, and adopted a female name. When she attempted to use the women's restroom, female employees objected. The company adopted a policy requiring restroom use according to biological gender. The transgender employee sued the company for sexual orientation discrimination, which is prohibited by Minnesota law. The state supreme court ruled in favor of the company, holding that the law does not require an employer to grant access to restrooms based on the gender self-image of an employee.
Was this helpful?
Stay Up-to-Date With How the Law Affects Your Life
Enter your email address to subscribe:
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.