Physician Lien Act Strictly Interpreted: Courts Give no Leeway in Requiring Compliance
This article was edited and reviewed by FindLaw Attorney Writers
| Last reviewedLegally Reviewed
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by FindLaw’s team of legal writers and attorneys and in accordance with our editorial standards.
Fact-Checked
The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our contributing authors. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please contact an attorney in your area.
In the recent case of Meier vs. Olivero, the court determined that the physician, Dr. Meier, did not include several items required by the Physician Lien Act in order to have a valid lien.
These items were:
- The patient's address.
- The date of the injury.
- The physician's own address.
- The name of the party alleged to be liable to the patient.
Since the physician did not observe the statutory requirements by including the above items, the lien was not considered valid.
Stay Up-to-Date With How the Law Affects Your Life
Enter your email address to subscribe:
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.