Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Planting the Seeds of Change in Florida

Since mid-2001, when the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services ("DACS") overtook the administration, regulation and enforcement of game promotions from the Florida Department of State, DACS has become the proverbial bane of the promotion world's existence. Since taking over game promotion duties, DACS has taken an extremely aggressive posture with respect to the enforcement of the Florida Games of Chance Statute § 849.094 (the "Statute"), which sets forth registration, bonding, advertising and fulfillment requirements for game promotions conducted within the state. Most notably, DACS has set forth a consistent pattern of levying monetary fines against game promotion sponsors for untimely promotion registration filings as well as for late or neglected winners list submissions. With fines ranging between $500 and $1,000 per offense, DACS has sent a clear message to the promotion industry that strict compliance with the requirements of the Statute is mandatory.

In December 2003, Jim Kelly, a senior attorney with DACS, invited the promotion industry to submit its opinion as to how the Statute should be modified, such that the industry could more successfully adhere to its overly onerous and outdated provisions. Since Mr. Kelly put forth this invitation, promotion industry groups have been hard at work brainstorming over more current and industry-beneficial changes to the Statute. The most major changes that we anticipate will be suggested include (1) requiring that only the material portions of the official rules (i.e., the abbreviated rules) be included in print advertising circulated in Florida, rather than requiring the full official rules; and (2) increasing the threshold amount for game promotion registrations to over $20,000 in aggregate prize values, from the seemingly outdated $5,000 prize value threshold. The rationale for such changes is obvious: the inclusion of the full rules in print advertising subjects game sponsors to extreme expenses, while the prevalence of Internet access has given potential game entrants easy access to the complete official rules via an Internet web address. In addition, a promotion with a prize pool exceeding $5,000 may have been considered a large prize pool when the Statute was originally enacted over 20 years ago, however, in today's world, $5,000 does not represent a significant amount of money.

Although the industry's suggestions have not yet been incorporated into a Florida State bill, there is some legislation currently pending, Florida House Bill 0571, which makes some minor modifications to the Statute, including only requiring a list of winners who have won prizes with a value exceeding $100, instead of $25. Whether or not some or all of the suggested changes are incorporated into the law, it appears as if DACS is at least willing to work towards a compromise that will adequately protect Florida consumers, yet also ease the arguably outdated constraints on promotion sponsors. Hopefully this will lead to smoother sailing for promotions in the Sunshine State.


About the Author:

Ronald R. Urbach, a partner in and co-chair of Davis & Gilbert's Advertising, Marketing & Promotions Department, is considered one of the country's leading advertising, promotion and marketing lawyers. His clients include numerous multinational, national and regional advertising agencies, including those agencies that are viewed as being the top creative agencies in the world. He can be reached at (212) 468-4824 or rurbach@dglaw.com. Acknowledgement is given to Joseph J. Lewczak, a partner at Davis & Gilbert, and Michael Abitbol, an associate at Davis & Gilbert, for their efforts in the preparation of this article.

About Davis & Gilbert LLP: Since the days when Sen. William Benton (the founder of Benton & Bowles) and his client, a major packaged goods company, asked Davis & Gilbert to structure the deal for the first radio soap opera, Davis & Gilbert has been synonymous with marketing communications and business law. Today the firm serves as counsel to many major corporations, including some of the world's leading brands, four of the largest advertising agency holding companies, independently-owned marketing and communications services companies of all sizes and types, and their owners and executives. The firm holds the preeminent position in this dynamic segment, handling virtually every legal requirement - from corporate governance, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, employment practices and executive benefits and compensation - to new media, real estate, taxation, estate planning and more. For additional information about Davis & Gilbert, visit www.dglaw.com

Was this helpful?

Copied to clipboard