Public Employees “Escape” Social Security Inclusion For Now
This article was edited and reviewed by FindLaw Attorney Writers
| Last reviewedLegally Reviewed
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by FindLaw’s team of legal writers and attorneys and in accordance with our editorial standards.
Fact-Checked
The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our contributing authors. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please contact an attorney in your area.
Representatives of state and local retirement plans are resting easy now that the administration's Social Security proposals do not include any provision mandating that new state and local public employees be brought into the system. However, organizations such as National Conference on Public Employee Retirement Systems, National Association of State Retirement Administrators and National Council on Teacher Retirement remain vigilant because Congress may still seek to include such a provision in future legislation. We believe that including state and local hires would adversely affect them and would add to Social Security's woes rather than eliminate them. Even Social Security's own figures show that, at best, a proposal of this nature would only alleviate 10% of Social Security's projected deficit. Meanwhile, Colorado is attempting to head off any potential problems of mandatory Social Security coverage by state legislation that would exclude police officers and firefighters from such federal legislation. While we doubt the validity of such legislation, fortunately it looks like that issue will not have to be decided, for the moment.
Was this helpful?
Stay Up-to-Date With How the Law Affects Your Life
Enter your email address to subscribe:
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.