A California Court of Appeals recently held that a city could request alternate bids in its pubic works solicitations even though the city's charter did not expressly authorize the practice. FTR International, Inc. v. City of Pasadena, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 3603 (1997). This appears to be the first reported California decision validating this practice. However, the court in FTR International also held that the city requesting bids on alternates must keep the names of the bidders confidential until after it determines which alternates to include in the project. When the City of Pasadena selected alternates in FTR International, the name of each bidder was included on the City's tabulation sheet. The court held that this fact created an appearance of impropriety, because it presented an opportunity for illegal favoritism in that the City could select those alternates which rendered the favored bidder low.
Selection of Alternate Bids Must be "Blind"
This article was edited and reviewed by FindLaw Attorney Writers | Last reviewed March 26, 2008
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by FindLaw’s team of legal writers and attorneys and in accordance with our editorial standards.
The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our contributing authors. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please contact an attorney in your area.
Was this helpful?