United States and Japan Remain in State of Disagreement Over Insurance Sector
This article was edited and reviewed by FindLaw Attorney Writers
| Last reviewedLegally Reviewed
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by FindLaw’s team of legal writers and attorneys and in accordance with our editorial standards.
Fact-Checked
The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our contributing authors. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please contact an attorney in your area.
As expected, Japan's Finance Minister Hikaru Matsunaga responded to Barshefsky's remarks the next day by releasing a statement contending that Japan fully met its obligations under the 1996 agreement and that "Japan will fully liberalize the third sector in January 2001."
In addition to Minister Matsunaga, an unidentified senior MOF official commented in response to USTR Barshefsky's statement that the U.S. government merely wants to protect U.S. firms' monopoly in the third sector at the expense of Japanese consumers. This official also commented that "there is no room for further discussion . . .Japan's policy of removing regulations aimed at cushioning drastic change in the third sector in 2001 remains unchanged."
Now that the July 1 date has passed and the parties have clearly stated their contradictory opinions on whether the third sector clock has begun, there does not appear to be a real sense of urgency to reach a compromise. Barshefsky's statement merely commented that the United States "looks forward to working with Japan over the coming weeks." There has been little discussion by U.S. officials regarding what action the United States might take against Japan if this stalemate continues.
Stay Up-to-Date With How the Law Affects Your Life
Enter your email address to subscribe:
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.