{"id":31831,"date":"2008-03-26T16:35:41","date_gmt":"2008-03-26T21:35:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/content.findlaw-admin.com\/ability-legal\/uncategorized\/direct-suits-against-insurance-companies-and-presumption-of.html"},"modified":"2008-03-26T16:35:41","modified_gmt":"2008-03-26T21:35:41","slug":"direct-suits-against-insurance-companies-and-presumption-of","status":"publish","type":"corporate","link":"https:\/\/corporate.findlaw.com\/corporate-governance\/direct-suits-against-insurance-companies-and-presumption-of.html","title":{"rendered":"Direct Suits Against Insurance Companies and Presumption of Consent to Use Vehicle"},"content":{"rendered":"<section class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline\">\n    <div class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-content\">\n                    <p><em>This article was edited and reviewed by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team.html\" rel=\"noopener\">FindLaw Attorney Writers<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n                | Last reviewed\n        <time>\n                            May 18, 2026\n                    <\/time>\n    <\/div>\n\n    \n    <details class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle fl-gutenberg-byline-legally-reviewed\">\n        <summary>\n            <i class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-icon\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n            Legally Reviewed\n        <\/summary>\n\n        <div class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle-content\">\n            <p><em>This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team.html\" rel=\"noopener\">FindLaw\u2019s team of legal writers and attorneys<\/a> and in accordance with <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/company-history\/editorial-policy.html\" rel=\"noopener\">our editorial standards<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n        <\/div>\n    <\/details>\n\n    <details class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle fl-gutenberg-byline-fast-checked\">\n        <summary>\n            <i class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-icon\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n            Fact-Checked\n        <\/summary>\n\n        <div class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle-content\">\n            <p><em>The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team\/contributing-authors.html\" rel=\"noopener\">contributing authors<\/a>. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please <a href=\"https:\/\/lawyers.findlaw.com\/?fli=bylinelink\" rel=\"noopener\">contact an attorney in your area<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n        <\/div>\n    <\/details>\n<\/section>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"rxbodyfield\" xmlns:o=\"urn:www.microsoft.com\/office\" xmlns:st1=\"urn:www.microsoft.com\/smarttags\" xmlns:w=\"urn:www.microsoft.com\/word\" xmlns:x=\"urn:www.microsoft.com\/excel\"><p>The Supreme Court of Mississippi issued its opinion in <i>State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co. v. Eakins, et al<\/i>, 996-CT-00034-SCT (decided December 10, 1998), which addresses two issues that have changed Mississippi law relating to the handling of automobile liability insurance claims.<\/p><p align=\"left\">The facts involve a motor vehicle accident in which a vehicle, insured by State Farm, owned by Chester (named insured) and driven by Jobe, struck the Plaintiffs. State Farm defended Jobe under a reservation of rights, but declined to pay the judgment awarded in favor of the Plaintiffs against Jobe, by contending that Jobe used the car without permission and as such he was not covered under the policy.<\/p><p align=\"left\">Justice McRae, writing for the Court, stated that &quot;in the interest of judicial economy,&quot; insurance companies can be sued directly by third party plaintiffs when there is a coverage dispute, which overrules numerous previous Supreme Court opinions. This allows coverage questions to be resolved prior to trial and brought in the same lawsuit through a declaratory judgment proceeding, making the insurance company a party defendant.<\/p><p align=\"left\">Additionally, the Mississippi Supreme Court held &quot;when ownership of a vehicle is undisputed, a presumption is created that the vehicle was being operated with the owner&#39;s consent,&quot; which presumption can only be rebutted by a <i>sufficient<\/i> showing to the contrary. Once this presumption arises, the statutory policy provisions of &#167;63-15-43, <i>Miss. Code Ann.<\/i>, as amended, shall apply.<\/p><p align=\"left\">9Note: The <em>Eikens<\/em> opinion has not been published due to the fact that a <em>Petition for Rehearing<\/em> is pending before the Court.<\/p><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Supreme Court of Mississippi issued its opinion in State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co. v. Eakins, et al, 996-CT-00034-SCT (decided December 10, 1998), which addresses two issues that have changed Mississippi law relating to the handling of &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_stopmodifiedupdate":true,"_modified_date":"","_cloudinary_featured_overwrite":false},"corporate_categories":[6474,6476],"class_list":["post-31831","corporate","type-corporate","status-publish","hentry","corporate_categories-corporate-governance","corporate_categories-corporate-governance__insurance"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/corporate.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/corporate\/31831","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/corporate.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/corporate"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/corporate.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/corporate"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/corporate.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31831"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"corporate_categories","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/corporate.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/corporate_categories?post=31831"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}