{"id":32383,"date":"2008-03-26T16:35:41","date_gmt":"2008-03-26T21:35:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/content.findlaw-admin.com\/ability-legal\/uncategorized\/chapter-13-case-dismissed-for-lack-of-eligibility.html"},"modified":"2008-03-26T16:35:41","modified_gmt":"2008-03-26T21:35:41","slug":"chapter-13-case-dismissed-for-lack-of-eligibility","status":"publish","type":"corporate","link":"https:\/\/corporate.findlaw.com\/finance\/chapter-13-case-dismissed-for-lack-of-eligibility.html","title":{"rendered":"Chapter 13 Case Dismissed for Lack of Eligibility"},"content":{"rendered":"<section class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline\">\n    <div class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-content\">\n                    <p><em>This article was edited and reviewed by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team.html\" rel=\"noopener\">FindLaw Attorney Writers<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n                | Last reviewed\n        <time>\n                            May 07, 2026\n                    <\/time>\n    <\/div>\n\n    \n    <details class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle fl-gutenberg-byline-legally-reviewed\">\n        <summary>\n            <i class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-icon\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n            Legally Reviewed\n        <\/summary>\n\n        <div class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle-content\">\n            <p><em>This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team.html\" rel=\"noopener\">FindLaw\u2019s team of legal writers and attorneys<\/a> and in accordance with <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/company-history\/editorial-policy.html\" rel=\"noopener\">our editorial standards<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n        <\/div>\n    <\/details>\n\n    <details class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle fl-gutenberg-byline-fast-checked\">\n        <summary>\n            <i class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-icon\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n            Fact-Checked\n        <\/summary>\n\n        <div class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle-content\">\n            <p><em>The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team\/contributing-authors.html\" rel=\"noopener\">contributing authors<\/a>. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please <a href=\"https:\/\/lawyers.findlaw.com\/?fli=bylinelink\" rel=\"noopener\">contact an attorney in your area<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n        <\/div>\n    <\/details>\n<\/section>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"rxbodyfield\" xmlns:o=\"urn:www.microsoft.com\/office\" xmlns:st1=\"urn:www.microsoft.com\/smarttags\" xmlns:w=\"urn:www.microsoft.com\/word\" xmlns:x=\"urn:www.microsoft.com\/excel\"><p>The Debtor (Lamar) formed a private investment club, in which members could participate by purchasing units. Seven years after the club was formed, it ran out of money. The members asserted claims totalling nearly $2 million.<\/p><p>Lamar filed a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, which is available only if the debtor owes &quot;noncontingent, liquidated unsecured debts of less than $250,000.&quot; Lamar contended that the club members&#39; claims, which he considered invalid, should not be considered &quot;debts&quot; for eligibility purposes, and that the claims were both unliquidated and contingent.<\/p><p>In affirming the bankruptcy court&#39;s decision to dismiss the case, the court first determined that, under the majority rule, claims are considered &quot;debts&quot; even if they are disputed. Thus, Lamar was not entitled to &quot;pry his way into Chapter 13&quot; by listing the club members&#39; claims at $1.00 each.<\/p><p>The court next found that the debts were liquidated, despite the fact that they were disputed, since they were &quot;subject to ready determination and precision in computation of the amount due.&quot;<\/p><p>Finally, the court held that the debts were non-contingent, in that all of the events giving rise to Lamar&#39;s potential liability arose before he filed his petition for Chapter 13 relief. Since Lamar had liquidated, noncontingent unsecured debt of over $250,000, he was not eligible for Chapter 13 relief.<\/p><p><u>Thomas W. Lamar d\/b\/a Lamar Investments Group v. Chapter 13 Trustee, et al<\/u>, Civil Action No. 97-70701 (November 12, 1997)(Cohn, Avern)(Docket No. 15, 17 pp.).<\/p><p>This article was written by Ronald S. Longhofer, a partner in our Litigation Department, and previously appeared in the March 1998 edition of the Michigan Bar Journal.<\/p><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Debtor (Lamar) formed a private investment club, in which members could participate by purchasing units. Seven years after the club was formed, it ran out of money. The members asserted claims totalling nearly $2 million. Lamar filed a Chapter &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_stopmodifiedupdate":true,"_modified_date":"","_cloudinary_featured_overwrite":false},"corporate_categories":[6480,6479],"class_list":["post-32383","corporate","type-corporate","status-publish","hentry","corporate_categories-finance__bankruptcy","corporate_categories-finance"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/corporate.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/corporate\/32383","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/corporate.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/corporate"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/corporate.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/corporate"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/corporate.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32383"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"corporate_categories","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/corporate.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/corporate_categories?post=32383"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}