{"id":34878,"date":"2008-03-26T16:35:41","date_gmt":"2008-03-26T21:35:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/content.findlaw-admin.com\/ability-legal\/uncategorized\/ex-employee-is-liable-for-spamming.html"},"modified":"2008-03-26T16:35:41","modified_gmt":"2008-03-26T21:35:41","slug":"ex-employee-is-liable-for-spamming","status":"publish","type":"corporate","link":"https:\/\/corporate.findlaw.com\/law-library\/ex-employee-is-liable-for-spamming.html","title":{"rendered":"Ex-Employee Is Liable For &#8220;Spamming&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<section class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline\">\n    <div class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-content\">\n                    <p><em>This article was edited and reviewed by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team.html\" rel=\"noopener\">FindLaw Attorney Writers<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n                | Last reviewed\n        <time>\n                            May 07, 2026\n                    <\/time>\n    <\/div>\n\n    \n    <details class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle fl-gutenberg-byline-legally-reviewed\">\n        <summary>\n            <i class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-icon\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n            Legally Reviewed\n        <\/summary>\n\n        <div class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle-content\">\n            <p><em>This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team.html\" rel=\"noopener\">FindLaw\u2019s team of legal writers and attorneys<\/a> and in accordance with <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/company-history\/editorial-policy.html\" rel=\"noopener\">our editorial standards<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n        <\/div>\n    <\/details>\n\n    <details class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle fl-gutenberg-byline-fast-checked\">\n        <summary>\n            <i class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-icon\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n            Fact-Checked\n        <\/summary>\n\n        <div class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle-content\">\n            <p><em>The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team\/contributing-authors.html\" rel=\"noopener\">contributing authors<\/a>. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please <a href=\"https:\/\/lawyers.findlaw.com\/?fli=bylinelink\" rel=\"noopener\">contact an attorney in your area<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n        <\/div>\n    <\/details>\n<\/section>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"rxbodyfield\" xmlns:o=\"urn:www.microsoft.com\/office\" xmlns:st1=\"urn:www.microsoft.com\/smarttags\" xmlns:w=\"urn:www.microsoft.com\/word\" xmlns:x=\"urn:www.microsoft.com\/excel\"><p>A California Superior Court judge granted Intel Corporation summary judgment in its trespass lawsuit against a former employee who sent thousands of derogatory e-mails into the company&#39;s system. In <i>Intel Corp. v. Hamidi<\/i>, No. 98AS05067 (Cal. App. Dep&#39;t Super. Ct. April 27, 1999), Intel sued a former employee for illegally accessing the company&#39;s e-mail system over the last three years and sending more than 30,000 messags of a disparaging nature to Intel employees. The court concluded that this conduct, commonly known as &quot;spamming,&quot; constitutes illegal trespass and rejected the ex-employee&#39;s argument that the connection of Intel&#39;s e-mail system into the internet converts the system into a public forum in which his speech was protected. The court concluded that, under federal and constitutional law, limited access for specific purposes does not convert private property to a public forum and the e-mails are not protected speech.<\/p><p>&#8211; COMMENT: This latest &quot;cyber case&quot; illustrates a growing trend of court rulings on technology in the employment law setting. Employers should prepare themselves for more cases and challenges to e-mail, voice mail and computer entries by implementing a specific policy addressing these areas. Please feel free to contact any of our attorneys should you wish to implement such a policy or policies.<\/p><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A California Superior Court judge granted Intel Corporation summary judgment in its trespass lawsuit against a former employee who sent thousands of derogatory e-mails into the company&#8217;s system. In Intel Corp. v. Hamidi, No. 98AS05067 (Cal. App &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_stopmodifiedupdate":true,"_modified_date":"","_cloudinary_featured_overwrite":false},"corporate_categories":[6500,6501,6497,6516],"class_list":["post-34878","corporate","type-corporate","status-publish","hentry","corporate_categories-law-library__communications-law","corporate_categories-law-library__constitutional-law","corporate_categories-law-library","corporate_categories-law-library__science-computers-technology-law"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/corporate.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/corporate\/34878","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/corporate.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/corporate"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/corporate.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/corporate"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/corporate.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34878"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"corporate_categories","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/corporate.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/corporate_categories?post=34878"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}