{"id":36527,"date":"2008-03-26T16:35:41","date_gmt":"2008-03-26T21:35:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/content.findlaw-admin.com\/ability-legal\/uncategorized\/contribution-rights-of-a-settling-defendant-in-texas.html"},"modified":"2008-03-26T16:35:41","modified_gmt":"2008-03-26T21:35:41","slug":"contribution-rights-of-a-settling-defendant-in-texas","status":"publish","type":"corporate","link":"https:\/\/corporate.findlaw.com\/litigation-disputes\/contribution-rights-of-a-settling-defendant-in-texas.html","title":{"rendered":"Contribution Rights of A Settling Defendant In Texas"},"content":{"rendered":"<section class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline\">\n    <div class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-content\">\n                    <p><em>This article was edited and reviewed by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team.html\" rel=\"noopener\">FindLaw Attorney Writers<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n                | Last reviewed\n        <time>\n                            May 07, 2026\n                    <\/time>\n    <\/div>\n\n    \n    <details class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle fl-gutenberg-byline-legally-reviewed\">\n        <summary>\n            <i class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-icon\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n            Legally Reviewed\n        <\/summary>\n\n        <div class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle-content\">\n            <p><em>This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team.html\" rel=\"noopener\">FindLaw\u2019s team of legal writers and attorneys<\/a> and in accordance with <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/company-history\/editorial-policy.html\" rel=\"noopener\">our editorial standards<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n        <\/div>\n    <\/details>\n\n    <details class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle fl-gutenberg-byline-fast-checked\">\n        <summary>\n            <i class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-icon\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n            Fact-Checked\n        <\/summary>\n\n        <div class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle-content\">\n            <p><em>The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team\/contributing-authors.html\" rel=\"noopener\">contributing authors<\/a>. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please <a href=\"https:\/\/lawyers.findlaw.com\/?fli=bylinelink\" rel=\"noopener\">contact an attorney in your area<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n        <\/div>\n    <\/details>\n<\/section>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"rxbodyfield\" xmlns:o=\"urn:www.microsoft.com\/office\" xmlns:st1=\"urn:www.microsoft.com\/smarttags\" xmlns:w=\"urn:www.microsoft.com\/word\" xmlns:x=\"urn:www.microsoft.com\/excel\">Traditionally, in Texas, a defendant can settle only its proportionate share of common liability and cannot preserve <b>contribution<\/b> rights against a non-settling defendant under common law or the comparative negligence statute, (Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 33.001 et seq.), by attempting to settle the plaintiff&#39;s entire claim. <b><i>Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Jinkins<\/i><\/b>, 739 S.W.2d 19 (Tex. 1987). Thus, in <b><i>Beech<\/i><\/b>, defendants who had settled a tort plaintiff&#39;s entire claim could not preserve the right to contribution from the alleged joint tort-feasors who did not participate in the settlement. The reasoning behind this, the Court stated, was that a settling defendant would then become a surrogate plaintiff, co-defendant and cross-plaintiff in its lawsuit against the other jointly responsible parties, confusing a jury and possibly prejudicing the remaining parties.<br\/><br\/> <p align=\"JUSTIFY\">However, in <b><i>W.R. Grace Co. v. Scotch Corp. Inc.,<\/i><\/b> 753 S.W.2d 743 (Tex.App.-Austin 1988, writ denied), a non-culpable retailer, who settled with an injured customer, did not extinguish its claim for <b>indemnity<\/b> against the manufacturer of a defective product in a products liability case. The Court of Appeals utilized the reasoning of the Supreme Court in <b><i>Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.<\/i><\/b>, 665 S.W.2d 414 (Tex. 1984), which held that &quot;comparative causation&quot; did not affect the right of a non-culpable retailer to receive indemnity from the manufacturer of the defective product.<\/p><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Traditionally, in Texas, a defendant can settle only its proportionate share of common liability and cannot preserve  rights against a non-settling defendant under common law or the comparative negligence statute, (Texas Civil Practice and Remedies &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_stopmodifiedupdate":true,"_modified_date":"","_cloudinary_featured_overwrite":false},"corporate_categories":[6522,6525,6520,6527],"class_list":["post-36527","corporate","type-corporate","status-publish","hentry","corporate_categories-litigation-disputes__civil-litigation","corporate_categories-litigation-disputes__civil-litigation__civil-remedies","corporate_categories-litigation-disputes","corporate_categories-litigation-disputes__civil-litigation__product-liability"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/corporate.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/corporate\/36527","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/corporate.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/corporate"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/corporate.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/corporate"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/corporate.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=36527"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"corporate_categories","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/corporate.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/corporate_categories?post=36527"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}