{"id":37439,"date":"2008-03-26T16:35:41","date_gmt":"2008-03-26T21:35:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/content.findlaw-admin.com\/ability-legal\/uncategorized\/previous-statements-about-disability-may-not-preclude-eligibility.html"},"modified":"2008-03-26T16:35:41","modified_gmt":"2008-03-26T21:35:41","slug":"previous-statements-about-disability-may-not-preclude-eligibility","status":"publish","type":"corporate","link":"https:\/\/corporate.findlaw.com\/litigation-disputes\/previous-statements-about-disability-may-not-preclude-eligibility.html","title":{"rendered":"Previous Statements About Disability May Not Preclude Eligibility in Subsequent Proceedings"},"content":{"rendered":"<section class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline\">\n    <div class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-content\">\n                    <p><em>This article was edited and reviewed by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team.html\" rel=\"noopener\">FindLaw Attorney Writers<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n                | Last reviewed\n        <time>\n                            May 09, 2026\n                    <\/time>\n    <\/div>\n\n    \n    <details class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle fl-gutenberg-byline-legally-reviewed\">\n        <summary>\n            <i class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-icon\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n            Legally Reviewed\n        <\/summary>\n\n        <div class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle-content\">\n            <p><em>This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team.html\" rel=\"noopener\">FindLaw\u2019s team of legal writers and attorneys<\/a> and in accordance with <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/company-history\/editorial-policy.html\" rel=\"noopener\">our editorial standards<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n        <\/div>\n    <\/details>\n\n    <details class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle fl-gutenberg-byline-fast-checked\">\n        <summary>\n            <i class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-icon\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n            Fact-Checked\n        <\/summary>\n\n        <div class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle-content\">\n            <p><em>The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team\/contributing-authors.html\" rel=\"noopener\">contributing authors<\/a>. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please <a href=\"https:\/\/lawyers.findlaw.com\/?fli=bylinelink\" rel=\"noopener\">contact an attorney in your area<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n        <\/div>\n    <\/details>\n<\/section>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"rxbodyfield\" xmlns:o=\"urn:www.microsoft.com\/office\" xmlns:st1=\"urn:www.microsoft.com\/smarttags\" xmlns:w=\"urn:www.microsoft.com\/word\" xmlns:x=\"urn:www.microsoft.com\/excel\"><b><i>Johnson v. State, Oregon Dept. of Human Resources, Rehabilitation Div.<\/i><\/b>, __ F.3d , 1998 WL 181297 (9th Cir. April 20, 1998)<p>Johnson claimed that her employer fired her in violation of the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA). The magistrate judge below granted the employer&#39;s motion for summary judgment following the employer&#39;s introduction of statements that Johnson had made about the extent and nature of her disability on applications for disabilities benefits. The Ninth Circuit, reversing the magistrate judge&#39;s grant of summary judgment for the employer, held that Johnson&#39;s &quot;pursuit or receipt per se of disability benefits does not bar [her] ADA claims.&quot; The court reasoned that, although representations by plaintiff&#39;s on disability benefits applications are &quot;useful evidence&quot; in ADA cases, and, in fact, &quot;may be binding in subsequent ADA claims,&quot; as definitions of &quot;disability&quot; differ, &quot;an individual can meet both the eligibility requirements for receipt of disability benefits and the definition of a &#39;qualified individual with a disability&#39; for ADA purposes.&quot; Therefore, the court noted, &quot;a statement averring a legal conclusion in a previous application or proceeding as to disability may not always preclude eligibility in subsequent applications or proceedings.&quot; Note that this case is in direct conflict with several others addressing the same issue.<\/p><p\/><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>, __ F.3d , 1998 WL 181297 (9th Cir. April 20, 1998)Johnson claimed that her employer fired her in violation of the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA). The magistrate judge below granted the employer&#8217;s motion for summary judgment following the &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_stopmodifiedupdate":true,"_modified_date":"","_cloudinary_featured_overwrite":false},"corporate_categories":[6522,6526,6520],"class_list":["post-37439","corporate","type-corporate","status-publish","hentry","corporate_categories-litigation-disputes__civil-litigation","corporate_categories-litigation-disputes__civil-litigation__civil-rights","corporate_categories-litigation-disputes"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/corporate.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/corporate\/37439","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/corporate.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/corporate"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/corporate.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/corporate"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/corporate.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37439"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"corporate_categories","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/corporate.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/corporate_categories?post=37439"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}