{"id":38020,"date":"2016-03-31T19:26:23","date_gmt":"2016-04-01T00:26:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/content.findlaw-admin.com\/ability-legal\/uncategorized\/westchester-county-s-new-human-rights-law.html"},"modified":"2016-07-07T08:12:23","modified_gmt":"2016-07-07T13:12:23","slug":"westchester-county-s-new-human-rights-law","status":"publish","type":"corporate","link":"https:\/\/corporate.findlaw.com\/litigation-disputes\/westchester-county-s-new-human-rights-law.html","title":{"rendered":"Westchester County’s New Human Rights Law"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

This article was edited and reviewed by FindLaw Attorney Writers<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n | Last reviewed\n

\n \n <\/i>\n Legally Reviewed\n <\/summary>\n\n
\n

This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by FindLaw\u2019s team of legal writers and attorneys<\/a> and in accordance with our editorial standards<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n <\/div>\n <\/details>\n\n

\n \n <\/i>\n Fact-Checked\n <\/summary>\n\n
\n

The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our contributing authors<\/a>. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please contact an attorney in your area<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n <\/div>\n <\/details>\n<\/section>\n\n\n\n

Westchester County has its own human rights law. In December 1999, the Democratic-controlled County Board of Legislators, by a 12-to-5 vote, approved Westchester County Laws, Chapter 700. Although this new law goes into effect 90 days after enactment, the new 15-member Westchester County Human Rights Commission, by law, cannot accept discrimination complaints for filing until July 1, 2000. That day happens to be a Saturday. Moreover, the County Board of Legislators expects the new Commission (which has yet to be named) to adopt procedural rules and regulations before actually accepting discrimination complaints. Westchester joins Albany, Nassau and other counties having their own human rights commissions because of the \u201cserious backlog\u201d and lengthy delays at the New York State Division of Human Rights. Some Westchester cities (e.g., Yonkers) previously created their own human rights commissions for the same reason. However, Westchester\u2019s new law and commission are by no means simply an alternative to the State Division. There are numerous special jurisdictional and procedural provisions in the new Westchester law that set its human rights commission apart. Since employees will have the option of filing their discrimination complaints with this new County commission instead of with the State Division, personnel directors have one more law to learn.<\/p>\n

This article will focus on the employment sections of the new Westchester law, which also covers discrimination in public accommodations, housing accommodations, commercial space, land transactions, and the issuance of credit. Like the State Human Rights Law, employers with four or more employees are covered but only for discriminatory practices \u201cwhich occurred in Westchester County.\u201d It is the situs of the discriminatory practice that controls, not the company\u2019s or the complainant\u2019s residence or workplace. A special family business provision excludes any employer \u201cwhere at least two-thirds of the employees are the children, parents, spouse or relatives within the third degree of consanguinity, or the spouses of such employee.\u201d<\/p>\n

Westchester County\u2019s protected group listing generally follows the State law list. The broad State definition of disability, for example, covering any medically-diagnosable condition, temporary conditions, and those that do not substantially limit a major life activity, is adopted, as is the State law\u2019s new reasonable accommodation<\/a> definition. There are notable exceptions, however, in comparison to the State law.<\/p>\n

The newest State protected classification (genetic predisposition or carrier status) is missing from the Westchester law. \u201cFamilial status\u201d was apparently added to the Westchester law at the last minute as it appears in many but not all sections of the new law. A definition is missing as well. Presumably, the State definition of \u201cfamilial status\u201d (covering (1) any person who is pregnant, has a child, or is in the process of securing legal custody and (2) anyone under age 18 living with a parent) at Executive Law Section 292(26) applies. \u201cAlienage or citizenship status,\u201d which appears in the New York City human rights law but not in the State law, was added to the new Westchester law. The New York City definition (the citizenship of any person or the immigration status of any person who is not a citizen or national of the United States) is also adopted. Finally, the County\u2019s religious discrimination provision (and the corresponding accommodation requirement) differs slightly from the corresponding State provision.<\/p>\n

The most controversial part of the new Westchester law is its prohibition of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. New York State is one of 39 states whose laws do not prohibit such discrimination. This provision, which is borrowed verbatim from the current New York City law, attracted the most media attention during the Board of Legislators\u2019 deliberations. The legislation committee\u2019s accompanying memorandum goes out of its way to restate and amplify the legislative intent on this point. That memorandum \u201chighlights\u201d that the new law \u201cis not to promote any particular course of conduct or way of life\u201d and \u201cdoes not allow for the expansion or alteration of the right to marry.\u201d Finally, the new law uses the City law\u2019s term \u201cgender\u201d (defined as the biological characteristics of being male or female) rather than the State law\u2019s term \u201csex.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Westchester law, unlike the State law, covers \u201cagents\u201d of employers. It also has no lower age limit for age discrimination in employment claims unlike the State law, which only covers persons age 18 or older. \u201cPerceived\u201d discrimination is covered by prohibiting discrimination because of someone\u2019s \u201cgroup identity,\u201d a new phrase. In fact, complaints may have to allege discrimination because of one\u2019s \u201cactual or perceived group identity.\u201d The protected group concept has arrived.<\/p>\n

The charge-filing period is one year as it is under both City and State laws. Compensatory damages<\/a> can be awarded but punitive damages are excluded in all employment cases. That conforms to the State law. The Westchester Commission, in its discretion, can award any party (even a respondent) costs in the form of:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. reimbursement for actual expenses reasonably incurred and<\/li>\n
  2. reasonable attorneys\u2019 fees, but only those \u201cresulting from frivolous conduct.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Such awards may be made against either parties or their attorneys. Frivolous conduct is defined as:<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. making a legal argument that \u201cis completely without merit\u201d or that is asserted \u201cprimarily\u201d for delay or \u201cto harass or maliciously injure another\u201d or<\/li>\n
    2. making false factual statements.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Frivolous conduct also includes making a frivolous application for these sanctions. Finally, while the Commission itself can initiate complaints, those complaints cannot seek compensatory (or punitive) damage remedies.<\/p>\n

      A complaint of discrimination must be verified. It must be accompanied by a special \u201cwaiver and relinquishment\u201d form whereby the complainant specifically waives all rights to file a complaint based on the same transaction or occurrence with the State Division or with any local Westchester human rights commission. Within 30 days after a complaint is filed, the Commission serves a copy by mail on the respondent and all \u201cnecessary parties.\u201d Time periods thereafter are dated from the date the complaint is filed. The Commission first determines within 60 days whether it has jurisdiction, which can be quite complex. Within 120 days, it determines whether there is probable cause to believe the respondent engaged in an unlawful discriminatory practice. If it finds probable cause, the Commission, unlike the EEOC, can hold evidentiary hearings before either itself or an administrative law judge. Unlike the City law, no answer is required of a respondent until after probable cause is found and until two days prior to the hearing.<\/p>\n

      The jurisdictional rules are complex since there are many commissions and courts that can entertain discrimination complaints. The Westchester Commission has no jurisdiction if the complainant has filed a civil action \u201cin any court\u201d based on the same transaction or occurrence unless that civil action is first withdrawn or voluntarily dismissed. It has no jurisdiction where another local Westchester city, town, or village commission would have jurisdiction. The Westchester Commission will not accept complaints where the same complaint has been filed with the State Division or with a local Westchester commission and will not accept transfers of cases from the State Division. The only exception is that complainants can ask the Westchester Commission to enforce a determination entered within the last 12 months by a local Westchester commission (not the State Division) that the respondent committed an unlawful discriminatory practice.<\/p>\n

      There is one more unique jurisdictional rule. Complainants must exhaust their internal company procedures before filing complaints with the Westchester Commission. To qualify, a company must have a written policy establishing an affirmative action, equal employment or similar office or department that would have jurisdiction over the subject matter of the complaint. There are two exceptions to this internal exhaustion requirement.<\/p>\n