Rosenberg charged Merrill Lynch with age discrimination, gender discrimination and sexual harassment. Upon employment, she signed a standard form mandating arbitration. In denying the defendant's motion to compel arbitration, the judge concluded that the New York Stock Exchange arbitration system does not effectively protect an employee's rights under Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, thus making the arbitration clause unenforceable.
Arbitration Clause Ineffective in Preventing Discrimination Suit
This article was edited and reviewed by FindLaw Attorney Writers | Last reviewed March 26, 2008
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by FindLaw’s team of legal writers and attorneys and in accordance with our editorial standards.
The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our contributing authors. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please contact an attorney in your area.
Rosenberg v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., Civ. No. 96-12267-NG (D. Mass. Jan 26, 1998)
Was this helpful?