Asymptomatic HIV as a Disability
This article was edited and reviewed by FindLaw Attorney Writers
| Last reviewedLegally Reviewed
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by FindLaw’s team of legal writers and attorneys and in accordance with our editorial standards.
Fact-Checked
The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our contributing authors. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please contact an attorney in your area.
The United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 ruling, has held that persons suffering from asymptomatic (no symptoms) HIV infection are protected by the ADA. In Bragdon v. Abbott, No. 97-156, U.S. Supreme Court (6/25/98), the court reached this conclusion after a determination that a female patient diagnosed with HIV infection was "disabled" within the meaning of the ADA, as the impairment substantially limited the patient's ability to reproduce. In this case, a dentist refused to treat the woman unless she agreed to be hospitalized. The woman had a cavity that needed to be filled. The ruling applied Title III of the ADA, which prohibits discrimination against disabled individuals in the full enjoyment of "good, services, facilities, privileges, advantages or accommodations of any public place."
Stay Up-to-Date With How the Law Affects Your Life
Enter your email address to subscribe:
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.