An employee brought a successful action against her former employer for violating Title VII. The Seventh Circuit, affirming the district court's award of both front pay and lost future earnings, held that "front pay may be awarded under Title VII in cases where reinstatement is unavailable." The Seventh Circuit also cautioned lower courts to distinguish between front pay, the equitable remedy which gives the plaintiff the same benefit he/she would have received had he/she been reinstated, and lost future earnings, which compensates the plaintiff for reputational harms that result in diminished future earnings.
Front Pay and Future Earnings in Title VII Cases
This article was edited and reviewed by FindLaw Attorney Writers | Last reviewed March 26, 2008
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by FindLaw’s team of legal writers and attorneys and in accordance with our editorial standards.
The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our contributing authors. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please contact an attorney in your area.
Williams v. Pharmacia, Inc., 137 F.3d 944 (7th Cir. February 26, 1998)
Was this helpful?