Acknowledging that the "confusion is understandable," the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals clarified the two different burdens on Title VII plaintiffs to prove discriminatory motive at the pretext stage, depending on the type of evidence plaintiff is able to offer. If a plaintiff is able to offer direct evidence of discriminatory motive at the pretext stage, the plaintiff need only offer "very little" direct evidence to create a triable issue of fact. Conversely, if the plaintiff is able to offer only circumstantial evidence of discriminatory motive, such evidence must be "specific" and "substantial" in order to create a triable issue of fact.
Proof of Discriminatory Motive in Title VII Case
This article was edited and reviewed by FindLaw Attorney Writers | Last reviewed March 26, 2008
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by FindLaw’s team of legal writers and attorneys and in accordance with our editorial standards.
The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our contributing authors. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please contact an attorney in your area.
Godwin v. Hunt-Wesson, No. 96-56830, 1998 WL 461918 (9th Cir., August 11, 1998).
Was this helpful?