Sexual Harassment in the Classroom
This article was edited and reviewed by FindLaw Attorney Writers
| Last reviewedThis article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by FindLaw’s team of legal writers and attorneys and in accordance with our editorial standards.
The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our contributing authors. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please contact an attorney in your area.
Another newsworthy decision from the United States Supreme Court's 1999 term, although set in the school context, has broader implications for employers and institutions.
In Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education, No. 97-843 (May 24, 1999), the Court allowed students to sue schools for sexual harassment committed by their classmates. Citing Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, the petitioner claimed that the school board's "deliberate indifference" to the "persistent sexual advances" of another student created a hostile school environment. Title IX prohibits a student from being discriminated against in participating or receiving the benefits of any education program receiving federal financial assistance. 20 U.S.C. § 1681(a).
The Court reversed the Eleventh Circuit, finding that there may be a private cause of action against a school board under Title IX for student-on-student (or "peer") harassment. The claimant must prove that the school had actual knowledge of the sexual harassment, but was "deliberately indifferent" to it, and the harassment is "so severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive that it can be said to deprive the victims of access to the educational opportunities or benefits provided by the school."
Stay Up-to-Date With How the Law Affects Your Life
Enter your email address to subscribe:
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.