An employee sued her former employer claiming sexual harassment and retaliation in violation of Title VII. The Second Circuit, reversing the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the employer, strongly cautioned against the use of summary judgment in cases involving allegations of sexual harassment. Noting that whether behavior qualifies as sexually harassing can only be determined by examining the specific context of such behavior and is often dependent upon "perceptions of the circumstances," the court stated that "a jury made up of a cross-section of our heterogenous communities provides the appropriate institution for deciding whether borderline situations should be characterized as sexual harassment and retaliation.
Summary Judgment Used Sparingly in Sexual Harassment Cases
This article was edited and reviewed by FindLaw Attorney Writers | Last reviewed March 26, 2008
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by FindLaw’s team of legal writers and attorneys and in accordance with our editorial standards.
The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our contributing authors. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please contact an attorney in your area.
Gallagher v. Delaney, __ F.3d __, 1998 WL 119614 (2d Cir. March 19, 1998)
Was this helpful?