Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Lex Mentis: Civil Rights for the Aesthetically-Challenged

This article was edited and reviewed by FindLaw Attorney Writers

| Last reviewed
Legally Reviewed

This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by FindLaw’s team of legal writers and attorneys and in accordance with our editorial standards.

Fact-Checked

The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our contributing authors. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please contact an attorney in your area.

Most of us are shameless "lookists." We have a natural preference for good-looking people over ugly ones, whether in the context of hiring employees, selecting a mate, or watching movies or television.

To date, most employers have largely been free to discriminate against the homely. A few nations, such as France, have outlawed discrimination based on physical appearance. In the U.S., only a few jurisdictions, such as the District of Columbia and Santa Cruz, California, have enacted legislation prohibiting discrimination in employment based on physical appearance. Otherwise, until recently, employers have been free to take good looks (or the opposite) into account when making hiring or employment decisions. A disturbing trend seems to be developing, however, in which physical appearance discrimination is being attacked under the guise of sex or disability discrimination. Two court decisions earlier this year represent the most recent examples of this trend.

The full text of this article is published in the Employee Relations Law Journal, Fall, 2003 issue.

 

Was this helpful?

Copied to clipboard