Contentious COBRA Question Answered
This article was edited and reviewed by FindLaw Attorney Writers
| Last reviewedLegally Reviewed
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by FindLaw’s team of legal writers and attorneys and in accordance with our editorial standards.
Fact-Checked
The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our contributing authors. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please contact an attorney in your area.
The U.S. Supreme Court has ended the disagreements in the lower courts over this question by ruling that the peculiar wording of COBRA requires that COBRA continuation coverage elections must be offered to qualified individuals even if they have other group health coverage at the time of the election. Thus, for example, if the individual otherwise qualified to make a COBRA election has coverage under the group health plan of the spouse's employer, the individual is nevertheless entitled to elect COBRA coverage. Geissal v. Moore Medical Corp. (U.S. Sup. Ct. June 8, 1998).
Stay Up-to-Date With How the Law Affects Your Life
Enter your email address to subscribe:
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.