Defense: The Whistleblower Amendments: Good Intentions Gone Awry?
This article was edited and reviewed by FindLaw Attorney Writers
| Last reviewedThis article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by FindLaw’s team of legal writers and attorneys and in accordance with our editorial standards.
The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our contributing authors. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please contact an attorney in your area.
The California Legislature passed SB 777 to significantly expand the rights and protections afforded employee whistleblowers. Certainly, encouraging employees to disclose corporate abuses as early as possible to prevent and minimize the consequences of corporate fraud is a laudable goal. Unfortunately, however, for every deserving employee these amendments protect, dozens of other employees will misuse these provisions to insulate themselves from legitimate corrective action or to strong-arm employers into lucrative and undeserved settlements. Moreover, glaring loopholes and vague language in these amendments impose unfair and counterproductive burdens on beleaguered California employers.
The next few years will reveal whether SB 777's enactment has actually stimulated the kind of employee whistleblowing that can serve as an early warning system to deter and minimize the fallout from corporate and government wrongdoing, as the Legislature intended, or whether these amendments have simply sparked a new crop of opportunistic and baseless employment claims.
The full text of this article is published in the August, 2004 issue of Bender's California Labor & Employment Bulletin.
Stay Up-to-Date With How the Law Affects Your Life
Enter your email address to subscribe:
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.