Retaliatory Harassment: Actionable?
This article was edited and reviewed by FindLaw Attorney Writers
| Last reviewedThis article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by FindLaw’s team of legal writers and attorneys and in accordance with our editorial standards.
The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our contributing authors. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please contact an attorney in your area.
We know that under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, an employer is strictly liable if a supervisor creates a hostile work environment, unless the employer has taken prompt remedial action which ends the harassment. But what is the employer's liability when the perpetrators are co-workers and not supervisors and the harassment is retaliatory in nature? This article reports on a recent case in the Third Circuit which not only answers the question in the affirmative, but also raises some difficult questions as to who is a supervisor, when supervisor conduct short of actual harassment leads to strict employer liability and whether a trial can ever be avoided when a retaliatory harassment claims has its origin in a sexual harassment complaint.
This article appears in the March 20, 2006 issue of the New Jersey Lawyer.
Stay Up-to-Date With How the Law Affects Your Life
Enter your email address to subscribe:
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.