Staring at Co-worker and Soured Romance May Rise to Level of Sexual Harassment
This article was edited and reviewed by FindLaw Attorney Writers
| Last reviewedLegally Reviewed
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by FindLaw’s team of legal writers and attorneys and in accordance with our editorial standards.
Fact-Checked
The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our contributing authors. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please contact an attorney in your area.
A California appeals court ruled that unwelcome staring by a male employee at a female co-worker may constitute unlawful harassment. The woman complained that the man had repeatedly asked her out and made sexually suggestive comments. In response, the company ordered the man to stay away from the woman. Nonetheless, the man continued to stare at the woman from a distance for five to ten minutes at a time, and occasionally grabbed his crotch while doing so. The woman argued that the man's staring created a sexually hostile work environment for her. The company insisted that the staring was only sporadic, at a distance, and not sexually suggestive. In light of the man's prior conduct toward the woman, the judge ruled that a jury would have to decide whether the staring was merely trivial or whether it was serious enough to rise to the level of unlawful sexual harassment.
In a separate case, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a claim for sexual harassment and retaliation based on the aftermath of a consensual relationship. The female plaintiff had received high marks for her work until she broke off a romance with her male supervisor. The supervisor then pleaded with her to resume their relationship, deluged her with phone calls, rubbed up against her sexually, and even threatened her if she did not resume their affair. When the plaintiff complained to the company, the general manager told the supervisor to find a way to "get rid of the bitch." Based on these facts, the appeals court upheld a jury award of $252,000 plus attorneys' fees.
Stay Up-to-Date With How the Law Affects Your Life
Enter your email address to subscribe:
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.