After being terminated by her employer, IBP, Moland brought a Title VII action for sexual harassment and retaliation against Bil-Mar Foods. Moland claimed that Bil-Mar, while not her employer, had nonetheless interfered with her employment with IBP. The court, denying Bil-Mar's motion for summary judgment, found that "the rights created under Title VII extend beyond the immediate employer-employee relationship and apply to discrimination [and retaliation] claims . . . where the defendant is in a position to interfere with the plaintiff's employment opportunities even though the plaintiff is not an employee of the defendant.
Title VII Rights Extend Beyond Employer-Employee Relationship
This article was edited and reviewed by FindLaw Attorney Writers | Last reviewed March 26, 2008
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by FindLaw’s team of legal writers and attorneys and in accordance with our editorial standards.
The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our contributing authors. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please contact an attorney in your area.
Moland v. Bil-Mar Foods, __ F.Supp. __, 1998 WL 65404 (N.D. Iowa February 13, 1998)
Was this helpful?