The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our contributing authors. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please contact an attorney in your area.
Section-by-Section Analysis
Section 1. Short Title. Section 2. Negotiating Objectives. Section 2 of the proposal sets out the "overall" and "principal" objectives that will guide the President in negotiating future trade agreements covered by the proposal. This format parallels that of section 1101 of the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988, which in turn was based on a similar structure in the Trade Act of 1974. These objectives address, among other subjects, trade barriers and distortions, including these aspects of foreign government policies and practices directly related to trade; trade in services; U.S. foreign investment; intellectual property; transparency; agriculture; and the protection of worker rights and the environment through specified multilateral institutions. Section 2(c) calls on U.S. negotiators to take important domestic policy objectives, such as the protection of human health and the environment and national security, into account when negotiating fast-track trade agreements. Negotiators are also instructed to ensure that the United States will retain the ability to vigorously enforce U.S. trade laws. In addition to the other Congressional consultation requirements set out in the proposal, section 2(c) instructs U.S. negotiators to ensure that designated congressional advisors are kept fully informed during the course of trade negotiations. Section 3. Proclamation Authority and Fast-Track Implementing Proposals. Section 3(a) provides the President with authority to reduce U.S. tariff rates under specified circumstances --without seeking further approval from the Congress --in return for concessions from U.S. trading partners. Much of the language on this subject is derived from earlier versions of tariff proclamation authority, with antecedents dating back to the mid-1930s. The proposal adds a provision that will allow the President to implement reciprocal, tariff harmonization or elimination agreements on a sectoral or regional basis, consistent with World Trade Organization rules. Section 3(b) provides that the President may negotiate and bring back to the Congress for approval and implementation under the fast-track procedures set out in section 151 of the Trade Act of 1974 certain trade agreements addressing tariff barriers, non-tariff barriers, or both. Those procedures call for the Congress to vote on agreements and their implementing legislation without amendment and within a fixed time period. Changes in U.S. law required to carry out a trade agreement may be included in fast-track implementing legislation only if the changes are both necessary or appropriate to implement the agreement and are related to trade. For an implementing bill to be subject to fast-track Congressional review, the President must adhere to numerous notice and consultation requirements included in the proposal. Under the proposal, the President's tariff proclamation authority, as well as fast-track procedures for implementing legislation, will be in effect until October 1, 2001. On request from the President, proclamation authority and fast-track procedures may be extended through September 30, 2005, subject to disapproval by either House of Congress. Sections 4 and 5. Notice, Consultations, and Implementation. Sections 4 and 5 contain a number of provisions requiring the President to notify and consult with the Congress before and during trade negotiations. These provisions ensure that the Congress is fully integrated into the formulation of U.S. goals, strategies, and decision-making for each trade negotiation. Section 5 establishes an expedited procedure for Congress to withdraw fast track if it finds that the Administration is not adequately consulting the Congress on trade negotiations. Certain of the notice and consultation requirements included in sections 4 and 5 are drawn from equivalent provisions in the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988. For example, the President must provide advance notice to the Congress before initiating a negotiation and must consult with the Congress before an agreement is concluded. The President must also describe in detail at the time he submits implementing legislation to the Congress how he intends to use existing regulatory and administrative authority to carry out the agreement. In addition, the proposal provides for Congress and the President to receive advice from the relevant private sector advisory committees concerning any agreement that the President has negotiated --before it is signed. The advisory committees cover a broad range of sectors and policy matters, including manufactured goods, agricultural commodities, services, intellectual property, foreign investment, labor, and the environment. Under existing law, the President must also consult with these committees regarding his objectives and bargaining positions in the negotiations. In addition, the President must solicit advice from the United States International Trade Commission, as well as views from the public, in connection with an agreement that would change U. S. tariff levels. The proposal adds new consultation requirements to further enhance Congressional oversight of the negotiation process for fast-track trade agreements. For example, the President must spell out for the Congress before negotiations begin his specific negotiating objectives and is required to consult with the Congress over the course of the negotiations. The President also must inform the Congress of any other agreements --in addition to the trade agreement --he intends to conclude. The President must also state whether the trade agreement will need to be implemented in part by legislation that is not subject to fast-track procedures. Section 6. On-going Negotiations. The proposal waives the requirement for the President to provide advance notification to the Congress of certain negotiations initiated prior to enactment of the proposal. These include negotiations commenced in 1995 with the Government of Chile on a comprehensive trade agreement and certain negotiations under the World Trade Organization that are currently underway or that may be initiated before the President's proposal is enacted. The requirement for the President to provide notice to, and consult with, the Congress over the course of the negotiations will continue to apply to these negotiations. Section 7. Conforming Amendments. The proposal makes changes to other statutes necessary to ensure that earlier provisions of law applicable to fast-track trade agreements continue to apply. For example, these amendments ensure that the public and private sector views are solicited regarding any trade negotiations initiated under the proposal.